Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix local dry executor selection #176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

rahfar
Copy link
Contributor

@rahfar rahfar commented Mar 20, 2024

PR to fix #174

@rahfar rahfar requested a review from umputun as a code owner March 20, 2024 21:17
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8366009056

Details

  • 4 of 4 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 84.427%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8362045164: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2651
Relevant Lines: 3140

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Owner

@umputun umputun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thx

@umputun umputun merged commit 8f8befe into umputun:master Mar 20, 2024
1 check passed
@rahfar rahfar deleted the local-dry branch March 20, 2024 22:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Local command actually runs in dry mod
3 participants