Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: Add tree builds #1001

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

andreittr
Copy link
Contributor

Description of changes

This PR adds tree builds -- builds that plate the products in a directory tree mirroring the source files.
The root of this source tree relative to which source files are considered is taken from the $(LIBNAME)_SRC make variable, if present.
This feature is most useful in libraries with many files sharing the same basename (e.g. sources named after class names).

It consists of 3 commits:

  • Add a separate build/ directory to place the build tree in (so source directories won't conflict with unikraft files); this feature is active if $(LIBNAME)_BUILDTREE is set to y.
  • Adapt path processing functions to retain source hierarchy when $(LIBNAME)_BUILDTREE is set to y.
  • Add make functions addlib_tree and addlib_tree_s that automate setting $(LIBNAME)_BUILDTREE.

Prerequisite checklist

  • Read the contribution guidelines regarding submitting new changes to the project;
  • Tested your changes against relevant architectures and platforms;
  • Ran the checkpatch.uk on your commit series before opening this PR;
  • Updated relevant documentation.

Base target

  • Architecture(s): N/A
  • Platform(s): N/A
  • Application(s): N/A

Additional configuration

Use addlib_tree[_s] to register a treebuild library.

@andreittr andreittr requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2023 21:53
@razvand razvand requested review from StefanJum, mariasfiraiala and mschlumpp and removed request for a team July 24, 2023 21:58
@razvand razvand added kind/enhancement New feature or request area/makefile Part of the Unikraft Makefile build system topic/build Topics to do with the build system priority/medium labels Jul 24, 2023
@razvand razvand added this to the v0.14.0 (Prometheus) milestone Jul 24, 2023
@razvand
Copy link
Contributor

razvand commented Jul 25, 2023

@andreittr, this fails when I try to build app-helloworld. Does it work on your side? I'm cloning the app-helloworld repository, the unikraft repository, and I'm applying this PR. And I get this error:

$ make
make[1]: Entering directory '/media/razvan/c4f6765a-efa5-4ebd-9cf0-7da9908a0189/razvan/unikraft/scripts/workdir/unikraft'
mkdir: cannot create directory ‘’: No such file or directory
/media/razvan/c4f6765a-efa5-4ebd-9cf0-7da9908a0189/razvan/unikraft/scripts/workdir/unikraft/lib/ukstore/Makefile.uk:3: *** could not create directory "".  Stop.
Makefile:1033: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed
make[2]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
Makefile:32: recipe for target '_all' failed
make[1]: *** [_all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/media/razvan/c4f6765a-efa5-4ebd-9cf0-7da9908a0189/razvan/unikraft/scripts/workdir/unikraft'
Makefile:6: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2

Copy link
Member

@StefanJum StefanJum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @andreittr. Can you give an idea on how the build directory should look like and on what application is this relevant to test?

@StefanJum
Copy link
Member

@andreittr, this fails when I try to build app-helloworld. Does it work on your side? I'm cloning the app-helloworld repository, the unikraft repository, and I'm applying this PR. And I get this error:

@razvand are you adding anything else in the config menu or something? I tried it on my system and on the remote systems and it seems to work fine.

@razvand
Copy link
Contributor

razvand commented Jul 27, 2023

@razvand are you adding anything else in the config menu or something? I tried it on my system and on the remote systems and it seems to work fine.

I get this problem on a Ubuntu 18.04 setup. You could use the Docker-based configuration here.

@StefanJum
Copy link
Member

I get this problem on a Ubuntu 18.04 setup. You could use the Docker-based configuration here.

Yes, I get the same error in the container. It fails here, tries to create the directory here and does it (build/libukstore/ exists), but the if fails for some reason

@andreittr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @andreittr. Can you give an idea on how the build directory should look like and on what application is this relevant to test?

Hi! Yes, this library PR right here: unikraft/lib-geos#1 makes use of tree building. It uses addlib_tree_s & defines the LIBGEOS_SRC path.

Copy link
Contributor

@mariasfiraiala mariasfiraiala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @andreittr, this works fine!

Reviewed-by: Maria Sfiraiala maria.sfiraiala@gmail.com

Copy link
Member

@StefanJum StefanJum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @andreittr. This seems to work fine, but we still have the issue mentioned above for ubuntu 18.04.
Also please rebase the pr on top of the staging branch so the ci/cd tests can run

@StefanJum
Copy link
Member

This still fails on ubuntu 18.04:

mkdir: cannot create directory '': No such file or directory
/workdir/unikraft/lib/ukstore/Makefile.uk:3: *** could not create directory "".  Stop.
Makefile:1055: recipe for target 'sub-make' failed

It's all good besides that. @razvand do we merge it as it is or do we search for a fix?

@razvand
Copy link
Contributor

razvand commented Aug 9, 2023

It's all good besides that. @razvand do we merge it as it is or do we search for a fix?

No, we have to fix that. @andreittr, any idea what's causing this? Could you check on a container running Ubuntu 18.04?

@andreittr
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, we have to fix that. @andreittr, any idea what's causing this? Could you check on a container running Ubuntu 18.04?

@razvand found the issue while rebasing against staging; it was a typo that was excercised by new code.

Pushed rebase w/ fix, should work ok now.

@razvand razvand requested a review from mschlumpp August 9, 2023 20:29
@razvand
Copy link
Contributor

razvand commented Aug 9, 2023

@StefanJum, @mschlumpp, please take another look.

@mschlumpp
Copy link
Member

@StefanJum I think it was just GitHub actions being broken for some reason. I triggered a retry of the failed jobs and they are now successful.

@andreittr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also build: Add option to place build objects in a tree seems to break the formatting of the build output by inserting a space in front of all filenames:

Hmm, that seems to be due to use of the $(eval ...) line in targrelpath; fixed it by removing the preceding space when invoking verbose_cmd.

@mschlumpp
Copy link
Member

It's still a problem for commands without a library specifier:

  CC      libkvmplat: irq.o
  CC      libkvmplat: lcpu.common.o
  LD       libkvmplat.ld.o
  OBJCOPY  libkvmplat.o
  CC      libkvmpci: pci_bus.common.o

@andreittr
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's still a problem for commands without a library specifier:

Should be fixed now by judicious application of $(strip ...).

Copy link
Member

@mschlumpp mschlumpp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed-by: Marco Schlumpp marco@unikraft.io

Copy link
Member

@StefanJum StefanJum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good, thanks.

Reviewed-by: Stefan Jumarea stefanjumarea02@gmail.com

support/build/Makefile.rules Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
support/build/Makefile.rules Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@andreittr andreittr force-pushed the ttr/treebuild branch 2 times, most recently from ed7dc05 to 6cc383d Compare August 11, 2023 09:22
@andreittr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased & addressed comments.

@razvand razvand requested a review from skuenzer August 11, 2023 09:31
@andreittr andreittr force-pushed the ttr/treebuild branch 2 times, most recently from ede06d3 to 52f90dd Compare August 11, 2023 10:29
This change adds the option to place build files in a dedicated
`.../build/` directory under the library build path.
This feature is opt-in per-library and enabled if the $(LIBNAME)__BUILDTREE
make variable is set.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Tatar <andrei@unikraft.io>
This adds the feature to place build products in a directory tree
mirroring the tree their source files are in.
This feature piggy-backs on top of the $(LIBNAME)__BUILDTREE flag from
87065c2f (build: Add option for dedicated build directory).
In addition, the $(LIBNAME)_SRC make variable must point to the common
prefix of a library's source file paths. Any intermediate directories
are created automatically.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Tatar <andrei@unikraft.io>
This change adds `addlib_tree` and `addlib_tree_s` as library
registration functions that enable build products to be placed in a
directory tree mirroring the source files. This is useful for code that
shares source filenames across multiple directories.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Tatar <andrei@unikraft.io>
Copy link
Member

@skuenzer skuenzer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for the work!

Reviewed-by: Simon Kuenzer simon@unikraft.io
Approved-by: Simon Kuenzer simon@unikraft.io

@unikraft-bot
Copy link
Member

Checkpatch passed

Beep boop! I ran Unikraft's checkpatch.pl support script on your pull request and it all looks good!

SHA commit checkpatch
1ab16fb build: Add option for dedicated build directory
0440c82 build: Add option to place build objects in a tree
aa4bead build: Add library registration for tree build

unikraft-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2023
This adds the feature to place build products in a directory tree
mirroring the tree their source files are in.
This feature piggy-backs on top of the $(LIBNAME)__BUILDTREE flag from
87065c2f (build: Add option for dedicated build directory).
In addition, the $(LIBNAME)_SRC make variable must point to the common
prefix of a library's source file paths. Any intermediate directories
are created automatically.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Tatar <andrei@unikraft.io>
Reviewed-by: Maria Sfiraiala <maria.sfiraiala@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Schlumpp <marco@unikraft.io>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Jumarea <stefanjumarea02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Kuenzer <simon@unikraft.io>
Approved-by: Simon Kuenzer <simon@unikraft.io>
Tested-by: Unikraft CI <monkey@unikraft.io>
GitHub-Closes: #1001
unikraft-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2023
This change adds `addlib_tree` and `addlib_tree_s` as library
registration functions that enable build products to be placed in a
directory tree mirroring the source files. This is useful for code that
shares source filenames across multiple directories.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Tatar <andrei@unikraft.io>
Reviewed-by: Maria Sfiraiala <maria.sfiraiala@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Schlumpp <marco@unikraft.io>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Jumarea <stefanjumarea02@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Kuenzer <simon@unikraft.io>
Approved-by: Simon Kuenzer <simon@unikraft.io>
Tested-by: Unikraft CI <monkey@unikraft.io>
GitHub-Closes: #1001
@unikraft-bot unikraft-bot added the ci/merged Merged by CI label Aug 11, 2023
@andreittr andreittr deleted the ttr/treebuild branch August 11, 2023 16:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/makefile Part of the Unikraft Makefile build system ci/merged Merged by CI kind/enhancement New feature or request priority/medium topic/build Topics to do with the build system
Projects
Status: Done
Status: Done!
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants