Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eslint to the latest version 🚀 #59

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 23, 2018
Merged

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Jun 23, 2018

Version 5.0.0 of eslint was just published.

Dependency [eslint](https://github.com/eslint/eslint)
Current Version 4.19.1
Type devDependency

The version 5.0.0 is not covered by your current version range.

If you don’t accept this pull request, your project will work just like it did before. However, you might be missing out on a bunch of new features, fixes and/or performance improvements from the dependency update.

It might be worth looking into these changes and trying to get this project onto the latest version of eslint.

If you have a solid test suite and good coverage, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes directly by merging the proposed change into your project. If the build fails or you don’t have such unconditional trust in your tests, this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Release Notes v5.0.0

Release blogpost

Migration guide

  • 0feedfd New: Added max-lines-per-function rule (fixes #9842) (#10188) (peteward44)
  • daefbdb Upgrade: eslint-scope and espree to 4.0.0 (refs #10458) (#10500) (Brandon Mills)
  • 077358b Docs: no-process-exit: recommend process.exitCode (#10478) (Andres Kalle)
  • f93d6ff Fix: do not fail on unknown operators from custom parsers (fixes #10475) (#10476) (Rubén Norte)
  • 05343fd Fix: add parens for yield statement (fixes #10432) (#10468) (Pig Fang)
  • d477c5e Fix: check destructuring for "no-shadow-restricted-names" (fixes #10467) (#10470) (Pig Fang)
  • 7a7580b Update: Add considerPropertyDescriptor option to func-name-matching (#9078) (Dieter Luypaert)
  • e0a0418 Fix: crash on optional catch binding (#10429) (Toru Nagashima)
  • de4dba9 Docs: styling team members (#10460) (薛定谔的猫)
  • 5e453a3 Docs: display team members in tables. (#10433) (薛定谔的猫)
  • b1895eb Docs: Restore intentional spelling mistake (#10459) (Wilfred Hughes)
Commits

The new version differs by 148 commits.

  • 36ced0a 5.0.0
  • 5fd5632 Build: changelog update for 5.0.0
  • 0feedfd New: Added max-lines-per-function rule (fixes #9842) (#10188)
  • daefbdb Upgrade: eslint-scope and espree to 4.0.0 (refs #10458) (#10500)
  • 077358b Docs: no-process-exit: recommend process.exitCode (#10478)
  • f93d6ff Fix: do not fail on unknown operators from custom parsers (fixes #10475) (#10476)
  • 05343fd Fix: add parens for yield statement (fixes #10432) (#10468)
  • d477c5e Fix: check destructuring for "no-shadow-restricted-names" (fixes #10467) (#10470)
  • 7a7580b Update: Add considerPropertyDescriptor option to func-name-matching (#9078)
  • e0a0418 Fix: crash on optional catch binding (#10429)
  • de4dba9 Docs: styling team members (#10460)
  • 5e453a3 Docs: display team members in tables. (#10433)
  • b1895eb Docs: Restore intentional spelling mistake (#10459)
  • a9da57d 5.0.0-rc.0
  • 3ac3df6 Build: changelog update for 5.0.0-rc.0

There are 148 commits in total.

See the full diff

FAQ and help

There is a collection of frequently asked questions. If those don’t help, you can always ask the humans behind Greenkeeper.


Your Greenkeeper bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling f1e1516 on greenkeeper/eslint-5.0.0 into 9457aed on master.

@unional unional merged commit 595e0e6 into master Jun 23, 2018
@unional unional deleted the greenkeeper/eslint-5.0.0 branch June 23, 2018 17:23
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2022

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.1.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants