We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In #55 we introduced a split of the items summarized in Gross Card LoLa (aliased 10920/30200) into
Gross Card LoLa
10920/30200
Cafe_Card
Verm_Card
10920/30700
The newly introduced latter column still captures too much. Postings identified to belong somewhere else are e.g.:
10920/23050
10920/32000
10920/31000
10920/31100
10920/31X00
Probably the easiest way of maintaining that would be to have dedicated Topics, which maintain their own accounts to post this into.
Consider only maintaining one other category that indicates to look up the account in the Kassa-Dokument.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
feat: [#58] Handle additional topics (#65)
186252c
New Topics `Deposit`, `Rental`, `Culture` that influence the suggested postings in the accounting report.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
In #55 we introduced a split of the items summarized in
Gross Card LoLa
(aliased10920/30200
) intoCafe_Card
(aliased still10920/30200
) andVerm_Card
(aliased10920/30700
).The newly introduced latter column still captures too much. Postings identified to belong somewhere else are e.g.:
10920/23050
10920/32000
10920/31000
or10920/31100
-> maybe10920/31X00
Probably the easiest way of maintaining that would be to have dedicated Topics, which maintain their own accounts to post this into.
Consider only maintaining one other category that indicates to look up the account in the Kassa-Dokument.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: