feature: Multi-part requests: user should be able to set content-type for each part in a multi-part request. #1602

[end3rbyte]

Multi-part requests: user should be able to set content-type for each part in a multi-part request (Issues: #1602)

Fixes #1602

Description

An optional column "Content-Type" was added.

Example how the content type is saved in the .bru file:

Demo:

multipart.bruno.demo.mp4

Contribution Checklist:

• The pull request only addresses one issue or adds one feature.
• The pull request does not introduce any breaking changes
• I have added screenshots or gifs to help explain the change if applicable.
• I have read the contribution guidelines.
• Create an issue and link to the pull request.

Note: Keeping the PR small and focused helps make it easier to review and merge. If you have multiple changes you want to make, please consider submitting them as separate pull requests.

Publishing to New Package Managers

Please see here for more information.

[end3rbyte]

Ready for Review

[end3rbyte]

The CI is failing because I have added a new endpoint to the CLI backend, end the CI run against the current prod backend which has not yet the endpoint I added

Can we continue the workflow to merge the PR ?

[end3rbyte]

Hi @Its-treason
Would it be possible to review this PR please ? It's assigned to you.
The issue fixed by this PR is pretty annoying with java backends because json needs to have the proper content type or it fails.
Thanks

[Its-treason]

Looks good, functionality wise.

One thing I don't really like is how the (Content-Type=text/plain) is just appended to the end. But I also understand, that it cannot be done better with the current Bru-Lang. Hope this can be refactored with the new Bru-Lang.

[MrFishchev]

Hello, will be there a possibility to upload a file as application/octet-stream (as an entire request), not like multipart-form data?

E.g. as Postman has:

[end3rbyte]

No, but it makes sens, so i suggest you to create an enhancement ticket for it, if there is no ticket already.

It should be added in this list

With a file selector to select the file to upload

[timothystone-knsl]

excited for this feature... it's almost a blocker for us in our abandonment of Postman.

[end3rbyte]

The tests are failing but they will pass as soon as this PR is merged. It is because I added a new route in the CLI test backend:
https://github.com/usebruno/bruno/pull/2121/files#diff-28dd2fe431464ec2945e9ca3470f5ae58a0be3b7c46b65980625150314b2988b

[end3rbyte]

Hi @helloanoop I fixed the conflicts and retested.
Could we please have this PR merged ?

[danishmughal]

Looking forward to this feature being merged - thanks for working on this @end3rbyte !

[lee-dongyeop]

@end3rbyte Hi, I'm waiting for this feature, can I know when it will be reflected?

[timothystone-knsl]

🙏 @end3rbyte do the conflicts need to be resolved before the merge can happen?

[tktsour]

This feature and also sending raw files as a request, are our only holdbacks from switching to bruno, hopefully we can have these on main asap <3 @helloanoop

[helloanoop]

Thank you all for your patience. The PR looks good overall. We are currently reviewing it and will provide an update in the next few days.

[end3rbyte]

I've sync and fixed the conflict

[lee-dongyeop]

@end3rbyte @helloanoop The �confict is said to have been fixed, so please merge.
I'm waiting for the feature. Thank you. <3

[vkopanja]

It's been 3+ weeks since the "merged in next few days". This feature is great and needed, any info on this?

[vkopanja]

Bump?

[bfbalonek]

Any update on this? not in v1.34.2 for windows

[lee-dongyeop]

@end3rbyte @helloanoop
Hello, I'm waiting for this feature.
It's been a while since you said this Pull Request is being updated.
I'd appreciate it if you could reflect it.