-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 901
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: support v6 uuids #754
Conversation
For some reason running npm install in subdirs (e.g. inside `npm run bundlewatch`) is causing `husky install` to run in the subdir, which breaks because it can't find the .git directory. Upgrading to husky@latest fixes the issue, though, so... 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Nice job!!
This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [uuid](https://github.com/uuidjs/uuid) | dependencies | major | [`^9.0.0` -> `^10.0.0`](https://renovatebot.com/diffs/npm/uuid/9.0.1/10.0.0) | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>uuidjs/uuid (uuid)</summary> ### [`v10.0.0`](https://github.com/uuidjs/uuid/blob/HEAD/CHANGELOG.md#1000-2024-06-07) [Compare Source](uuidjs/uuid@v9.0.1...v10.0.0) ##### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES - update node support (drop node@12, node@14, add node@20) ([#​750](uuidjs/uuid#750)) ##### Features - support support rfc9562 MAX uuid (new in RFC9562) ([#​714](uuidjs/uuid#714)) ([0385cd3](uuidjs/uuid@0385cd3)) - support rfc9562 v6 uuids ([#​754](uuidjs/uuid#754)) ([c4ed13e](uuidjs/uuid@c4ed13e)) - support rfc9562 v7 uuids ([#​681](uuidjs/uuid#681)) ([db76a12](uuidjs/uuid@db76a12)) - update node support matrix (only support node 16-20) ([#​750](uuidjs/uuid#750)) ([883b163](uuidjs/uuid@883b163)) - support rfc9562 v8 uuids ([#​759](uuidjs/uuid#759)) ([35a5342](uuidjs/uuid@35a5342)) ##### Bug Fixes - revert "perf: remove superfluous call to toLowerCase ([#​677](uuidjs/uuid#677))" ([#​738](uuidjs/uuid#738)) ([e267b90](uuidjs/uuid@e267b90)) </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or rename PR to start with "rebase!". 🔕 **Ignore**: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again. --- This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate).
((v1Bytes[6] & 0x0f) << 4) | ((v1Bytes[7] >> 4) & 0x0f), | ||
((v1Bytes[7] & 0x0f) << 4) | ((v1Bytes[4] & 0xf0) >> 4), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @broofa, i'm just curious, but in this case, is there any difference doing >> 4
and then & 0x0f
, compared to & 0xf0
and then >> 4
?
i noticed that you did the former on the first line, while the rest uses the latter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I believe both ways are functionally equivalent. 'Not sure why I wrote it this way. It'd probably be good to switch it to &0xf0) >> 4)
for consistency at some point, but not something I'm going to lose sleep over. :-)
Adding support for RFC9562 version 6 UUIDs. Adds the following APIs:
v6(options, [buf, [offset]])
v1ToV6(uuid)
v6ToV1(uuid)
Note
v6()
is just a thin wrapper aroundv1ToV6(v1(...))
. However this required some changes tov1()
because RFC9562 specifies that v6 UUIDs SHOULD be reset to a pseudorandom value for each new UUIDv6 generated.