Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement different sorting for activity groups #38

Open
valentingc opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Implement different sorting for activity groups #38

valentingc opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement Enhancement to an existing feature/feature set on hold Will be looked into at a later date optional Will be looked into but might not get implement if it's not worth the effort

Comments

@valentingc
Copy link
Contributor

valentingc commented Apr 22, 2021

Describe the solution you'd like
Currently activity groups are implemented as a linked list, so new activity groups are added at the end and the position can manually be moved upwards/downwards.
It would make sense to change this to date sorted activity groups, so if there are dates set in activities, use these for the activity groups (calculated dates).

Additional context
None so far

@valentingc valentingc added enhancement Enhancement to an existing feature/feature set optional Will be looked into but might not get implement if it's not worth the effort labels Apr 22, 2021
@valentingc valentingc added this to the v1.0 milestone Apr 22, 2021
@DominicLuidold DominicLuidold modified the milestones: v1.0, v1.1 May 6, 2021
@DominicLuidold DominicLuidold removed this from the v1.1 milestone May 31, 2021
@DominicLuidold DominicLuidold added the on hold Will be looked into at a later date label May 31, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhancement to an existing feature/feature set on hold Will be looked into at a later date optional Will be looked into but might not get implement if it's not worth the effort
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants