-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Doc tweaks for paper resubmission #374
Conversation
I've built it via RTD. There are definitely rendering problems. It looks like you're trying to write Markdown, but this is RST. |
The docs will built it via RTD highlight a number of remaining rendering issues. The use of bold in certain contexts is odd and bullet style is inconsistent. Neither match the rest of the docs. I would also prefer the figure making portion be moved to the figure repo. Even with that, this section constitutes over half of the developer documentation. If it is going to remain this verbose and fastidious, perhaps it would be better to house it on a different page? |
@MekWarrior Moving the figure creation to the |
@dylanbannon my supposition would be that we have a number of different repos that we point to from this one. As the figure making is already self contained, it would seem consistent with our approach that one would come to this portion of the docs for information on benchmarking and to the figure repo for information on figure making (and there's no reason we can't cross-link the 2). Moreover, it would help unclutter the docs on our primary repo, making it easier for users to parse and use. |
It does seem natural to point them to the publication repo and say something like:
|
Ok, I pushed a rearranged commit. So, you guys think everything in the two figure recreation subheadings should be moved to the |
Also, I merged the |
…ily moved over to publication-figures
Co-authored-by: willgraf <7930703+willgraf@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: willgraf <7930703+willgraf@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: willgraf <7930703+willgraf@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: willgraf <7930703+willgraf@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The storage bucket icon is much improved!
I don't like that arrows between Redis/Frontend and Redis/Autoscaler are off center. For some reason it really stands out to me.
Maybe we can move the purple GPU zone further into the corner to allow the straight line between redis and the frontend to be in the middle of the frontend icon?
I think the TF/ConsumerB arrow needs to be closer to the center of the TF icon as well, it looks weird to me that it's so close to the edge.
Co-authored-by: willgraf <7930703+willgraf@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm pretty satisfied with both the text and the image, but we should get input from both @MekWarrior and @vanvalen.
I think the architecture diagram looks much better. I feel like there are still some issues with spacing and centering, but I could be ok with this if vanvalen approves. Text reads well. |
I was looking at the image a bit more, and the blank space inside the purple GPU zone is bothering me. I'll see if I can mock up some changes that might help. I took a stab at fixing some things, and just opened a PR for the changes. It's not necessary to merge it in, but I thought it would help better show some of the things I wanted fixed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made a last-minute change to the image (Consumer A was on both icons). It all looks good to me now.
@dylanbannon Thanks for your patience in dealing with so much of my nitpicky feedback!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 very minor changes and I'm good to go.
Co-authored-by: MekWarrior <moen.erick@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Thank you for the changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💯 🥇
* Fix documentation badge (#354) * Bump redis-consumer versions to 0.6.1. (#355) * If no default-region is selected, use us-west1 (#358) * Clarify Quota increase documentation (#359) * GPUS_ALL_REGIONS does not always exist in the quota, if not just set it to minimum. (#362) * Fix last references to old project name. (#364) * set prometheusOperator.cleanupCustomResource to true to delete CRDs when the chart is deleted. (#365) * Warn the user that multizone clusters will have additional egress fees. (#366) * Remove deprecated helmfiles. (#368) * General documentation fixes. (#360) * update documentation in version to 1.2.1 in preparation for pending release. (#371) * Doc tweaks for paper resubmission (#374) * Set the KUBERNETES_VERSION to 1.15. 1.14 is no longer supported. (#376) Co-authored-by: willgraf <7930703+willgraf@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: dylanbannon <dylanbannon5@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: MekWarrior <moen.erick@gmail.com>
Updating Kiosk diagram, both XML file for draw.io and resulting PNG.
Adding section to developer docs about verifying benchmarking numbers.