-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define & document metric naming rules #3600
Comments
I'm wondering if we shouldn't apply these naming rules to our internal metrics as well. Currently we do not appear to be. |
Was thinking the same thing. We should. |
Here's a rough initial take: Metric namesFor metrics, Vector broadly follows the Prometheus metric naming standards. Hence, a metric name:
|
Looking good. A few quick comments:
In general, the shorter and simpler, the more likely people will follow it. I know these are similar to the Prometheus page, but I find that to be verbose as well. Feel free to disagree. I was a math/CS major 😄 . |
2nd cut: Metric namesFor metrics, Vector broadly follows the Prometheus metric naming standards. Hence, a metric name:
|
👍 I like it. I might suggest the following adjustments:
The list at the bottom of https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/naming/#base-units has some additional base units we can adopt (like |
👍 - lets add this to |
Signed-off-by: James Turnbull <james@lovedthanlost.net>
…ordotdev#3653) Signed-off-by: Brian Menges <brian.menges@anaplan.com>
Similar to #3247, we should document how we name and tag metrics. Once #3519 is approved, we should materialize the rules from there (#3519 (comment)). It would be nice to include these in our public docs since it does have user facing meaning.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: