-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Identify nodes in a phylogeny #1683
Comments
Dear @psorigue, You can use HyPhy Vision to view the results. There is an option to If this is not an option for you, we also have a phylogenetic tree viewer example with internal nodes labeled here Best, |
Dear @psorigue, Yes, indeed. There are several ways to do it.
Best, |
Hi Sergei and Steven,
Thanks a lot for the help. I just wanted to mention that on Hyphy Vision I
cannot do it (see attached image). But I will do it by using the JSON
labelled nwk tree.
All the best!
[image: image.png]
Missatge de Sergei Pond ***@***.***> del dia dj., 25 de gen.
2024 a les 14:22:
… Dear @psorigue <https://github.com/psorigue>,
Yes, indeed. There are several ways to do it.
1.
The Newick tree string reported in the JSON file is annotated with
node names, including internal names.
image.png (view on web)
<https://github.com/veg/hyphy/assets/1018513/a87729e7-f068-4ba3-8654-200b1ad62e34>.
This is useful if you wish to use an external tree viewer, or annotate
things programmatically (e.g. in Python)
2.
You can view internal node names by loading the JSON file into
***@***.***/absrel as @stevenweaver
<https://github.com/stevenweaver> suggested.
Best,
Sergei
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1683 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZZAVFRR6H6BWITPBJX4ZP3YQJTA3AVCNFSM6AAAAABCKS4TU6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJQGMYTENRUHE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Dear @psorigue, Could you please re-upload the image directly at github? If you attach images in an e-mail response, they don't make it through. Best, |
Dear @psorigue, If you adjust the dimension of the plot, e.g. to Best, |
I see!
Thanks! :)
Missatge de Sergei Pond ***@***.***> del dia dj., 25 de gen.
2024 a les 15:02:
… Dear @psorigue <https://github.com/psorigue>,
If you adjust the dimension of the plot, e.g. to 8192x800 (and click
Resize), you should have enough room to see the labels.
Best,
Sergei
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1683 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZZAVFR7BIJ4SYJA6Z66KGLYQJXZBAVCNFSM6AAAAABCKS4TU6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJQGM4DOMBQHE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I saw that some nodes that appear in the output, are not present in the phylogeny internal nodes. Is there a reason that I'm missing for this? |
Dear @psorigue, Those are most likely zero-length branches which get deleted in the analysis tree for speed. The input tree retains such nodes. Best, |
Ok thanks!
Missatge de Sergei Pond ***@***.***> del dia dj., 25 de gen.
2024 a les 16:33:
… Dear @psorigue <https://github.com/psorigue>,
Those are most likely zero-length branches which get deleted in the
analysis tree for speed. The input tree retains such nodes.
Best,
Sergei
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1683 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZZAVFSELL4OSRTX2MEPEY3YQKCNXAVCNFSM6AAAAABCKS4TU6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMJQGU3DMOBRGA>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Stale issue message |
Hi,
I am using aBSREL and I obtained the already-parsed output. However, my phylogeny is very large, and I cannot identify the nodes that are named as 'node131'. Is there a way to map these nodes on the phylogeny, so I can identify what branches were under selection?
Thanks for the support
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: