Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

☕ Update GitHub Actions #296

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023
Merged

☕ Update GitHub Actions #296

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023

Conversation

lambdalisue
Copy link
Member

@lambdalisue lambdalisue commented Dec 11, 2023

SSIA

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated the GitHub Actions workflows to use the latest actions/checkout version for improved performance and features.
  • Refactor

    • Modified workflow triggers to better align with project needs, ensuring only relevant changes initiate the CI/CD process.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2023

Walkthrough

The GitHub workflow files have been collectively updated to use the newer v4 version of the actions/checkout action. This change is consistent across multiple workflow files, ensuring that the repository's automation processes are utilizing the latest features and improvements of the checkout action.

Changes

File Path Summary
.github/workflows/.../reviewdog.yml Updated actions/checkout from v3 to v4.
.github/workflows/.../test.yml Updated actions/checkout from v3 to v4 and modified file patterns for workflow triggers.
.github/workflows/.../update.yml Updated actions/checkout from v3 to v4.

🐇✨
In the land of code and byte,
We hop to v4 with delight.
Checkouts fresh, workflows gleam,
A rabbit's update dream! 🌟🚀

(\__/) ||  
(•ㅅ•) ||  
/   づ  

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ?


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
  • To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
  • Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c50865d) 92.59% compared to head (b640485) 92.59%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #296   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.59%   92.59%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines          81       81           
  Branches        6        6           
=======================================
  Hits           75       75           
  Misses          6        6           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c50865d and b640485.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/reviewdog.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (3 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/update.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/update.yml
Additional comments: 5
.github/workflows/reviewdog.yml (2)
  • 17-17: The update to actions/checkout@v4 is consistent with the PR's objective to update GitHub Actions. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of the steps in the workflow.

  • 3-7: The trigger paths for the reviewdog workflow remain focused on .vim files and the workflow file itself, which seems appropriate for a linter configuration.

.github/workflows/test.yml (3)
  • 9-19: The addition of "deno.jsonc" to the paths that trigger the workflow seems intentional and is consistent for both push and pull_request events. This change should be verified to ensure that it aligns with the intended behavior of the workflow triggers.

  • 37-37: The update of the actions/checkout action from v3 to v4 is consistent with the PR's objective. Ensure that this version is compatible with the rest of the workflow steps and that no breaking changes affect the current setup.

  • 65-65: The update of the actions/checkout action to v4 is also applied here, which is consistent with the changes in the previous job. As before, verify that this version is compatible with the rest of the workflow steps.

@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit 886bfa0 into main Dec 11, 2023
19 checks passed
@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the update-ci branch December 11, 2023 05:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant