Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate commands by Change2CommandTransformer instead of ChangeProcessor #21

Closed
HeikoKlare opened this issue Sep 29, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@HeikoKlare
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, a ChangeProcessor has to return Commands that can be executed afterwards.

It makes no sense that the transformation developer (the one who defines ChangeProcessors) has to think about creating commands, but just wants to define change propagating routines that are executed correctly.

We have to move the logic for creating commands to the Change2CommandTransforming and let the ChangeProcessor simply define a method that executes a change propagation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant