Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Merged by Bors] - feat: go to domain types (CT-959) #364

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - feat: go to domain types (CT-959) #364

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

z4o4z
Copy link
Member

@z4o4z z4o4z commented Sep 9, 2022

Fixes or implements CT-959

Checklist

  • this is a breaking change and should publish a new major version
  • appropriate tests have been written

@z4o4z
Copy link
Member Author

z4o4z commented Sep 9, 2022

bors r+

bors-vf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2022
@z4o4z
feat: go to domain types (CT-959) (#364)
549bdfc 
<!-- You can erase any parts of this template not applicable to your Pull Request. -->

**Fixes or implements CT-959**

### Checklist

- [ ] this is a breaking change and should publish a new major version
- [ ] appropriate tests have been written
@bors-vf
Copy link

bors-vf bot commented Sep 9, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors-vf bors-vf bot changed the title feat: go to domain types (CT-959) [Merged by Bors] - feat: go to domain types (CT-959) Sep 9, 2022
@bors-vf bors-vf bot closed this Sep 9, 2022
@bors-vf bors-vf bot deleted the evgeny/go-to-domain/CT-959 branch September 9, 2022 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@viniciusdacal viniciusdacal viniciusdacal approved these changes

@filipemerker filipemerker Awaiting requested review from filipemerker

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ready for review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@z4o4z @viniciusdacal