Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New package: g810-led-0.3.5 #12521

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2019
Merged

Conversation

misuchiru03
Copy link
Contributor

In response to this request

@misuchiru03 misuchiru03 changed the title New packge: g810-led-0.3.4 New package: g810-led-0.3.4 Jun 18, 2019
@misuchiru03
Copy link
Contributor Author

This package will not build for musl.

@Johnnynator
Copy link
Member

Johnnynator commented Jun 18, 2019

Can you please cleanup your branch so it only contains the g810-led commit.
Also instead of archs use

case $XBPS_TARGET_MACHINE in
    *-musl) broken="reason/build log";;
esac

srcpkgs/g810-led/template Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
srcpkgs/g810-led/template Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@misuchiru03
Copy link
Contributor Author

Patched for musl build, cleaned-up commit, and removed -devel package.

@misuchiru03 misuchiru03 force-pushed the g810-led-0.3.4 branch 3 times, most recently from 6351d64 to 9c76ff9 Compare June 18, 2019 15:44
@misuchiru03 misuchiru03 changed the title New package: g810-led-0.3.4 New package: g810-led-0.3.5 Jun 24, 2019
@misuchiru03
Copy link
Contributor Author

Upstream merged PR to correct libc stdint variables--removed patch as no longer necessary.

@Johnnynator Johnnynator merged commit d5a587f into void-linux:master Jun 24, 2019
@dragozet
Copy link

Thank you @misuchiru03 works great!

@misuchiru03 misuchiru03 deleted the g810-led-0.3.4 branch October 6, 2019 02:03
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 18, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants