Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

aerc: update to 0.6.0. #34316

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2021
Merged

aerc: update to 0.6.0. #34316

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2021

Conversation

kotajacob
Copy link
Contributor

@kotajacob kotajacob commented Nov 29, 2021

The original upstream maintainer, Drew Devault, has stepped down and a
fork was created (with Drew's approval) under the same name. The fork
has patched in a large backlog of crashes and bug fixes and put out a
new version 0.6.0 recently. I think now that the aerc community has
consolidated on this fork it would be appropriate to update our package
to the new upstream.

More info about the fork and new maintainer can be found in this
discussion: https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc/%3CCFBVJ3G1Y4YB.ZI6C02D0MS0S%40diabtop%3E

Testing the changes

I tested the changes in this PR: YES

Local build testing

I built this PR locally for my native architecture, x86_64-libc

The original upstream maintainer, Drew Devault, has stepped down and a
fork was created (with Drew's approval) under the same name. The fork
has patched in a large backlog of crashes and bug fixes and put out a
new version 0.6.0 recently. I think now that the aerc community has
consolidated on this fork it would be appropriate to update out package
to the new upstream.

More info about the fork and new maintainer can be found in this
discussion: https://lists.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc/%3CCFBVJ3G1Y4YB.ZI6C02D0MS0S%40diabtop%3E
@kotajacob
Copy link
Contributor Author

A list of the bugfixes and changes is here: https://lists.sr.ht/~rjarry/aerc-announce/%3CCFLJEY6YD5BT.3A85XMZBQ76L0%40diabtop%3E

@ericonr
Copy link
Member

ericonr commented Nov 29, 2021

Thanks for the update and comprehensive commit message. I will try to test this locally soon and merge when I have confirmed it's working.

@shtayerc looks good to you?

@shtayerc
Copy link
Contributor

I was not aware of the fork, thanks for that information. New version is working fine for me on x86_64 glibc.
LGTM

@ericonr ericonr merged commit 1c97491 into void-linux:master Dec 2, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 2, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants