Suricata update to 7.0.2 #48498
Closed
Suricata update to 7.0.2 #48498
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Tested on x86_64-glibc - dell P5520
The build fails on several architectures with "too many open files". This reverts commit cde9641.
The "too many open files" issue affects the reverted version anyway, so we'll try just increasing the ulimit. This reverts commit b779aac.
Without this patch, it is not possible to use completion for zathura's `:open` command as it will only list files which zathura cannot open and exclude all other, instead of doing it the other way around.
|
Don't open and close PRs, as that makes it harder for progress and fixes to be tracked. Instead, fix your branch and then force-push. |
|
Created a new PR #48501 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Testing the changes
I tested the changes in this PR: YES
This new package conforms to the package requirements: YES
I built this PR locally for my native architecture, x86_64-glibc