Skip to content

Conversation

yyx990803
Copy link
Member

@yyx990803 yyx990803 commented Nov 11, 2024

This is a WIP draft merging Vapor development back into the main repo.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Size Report

Bundles

File Size Gzip Brotli
compiler-dom.global.prod.js 84.1 kB 29.8 kB 26.3 kB
runtime-dom.global.prod.js 103 kB (+1.45 kB) 39.1 kB (+522 B) 35.2 kB (+535 B)
vue.global.prod.js 161 kB (+1.53 kB) 59.3 kB (+593 B) 52.8 kB (+542 B)

Usages

Name Size Gzip Brotli
createApp (CAPI only) 47.5 kB (+769 B) 18.6 kB (+260 B) 17 kB (+243 B)
createApp 55.9 kB (+837 B) 21.7 kB (+274 B) 19.8 kB (+192 B)
createApp + vaporInteropPlugin 67.9 kB 25.9 kB 23.5 kB
createVaporApp 20.8 kB 8.28 kB 7.57 kB
createSSRApp 60.2 kB (+894 B) 23.5 kB (+331 B) 21.4 kB (+317 B)
defineCustomElement 60.9 kB (+846 B) 23.2 kB (+265 B) 21.2 kB (+269 B)
overall 70.1 kB (+878 B) 26.9 kB (+290 B) 24.5 kB (+271 B)

@yyx990803 yyx990803 changed the base branch from main to minor November 14, 2024 00:13
@edison1105 edison1105 marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2025 00:05
@edison1105 edison1105 merged commit bfe5ce3 into minor Jul 7, 2025
17 checks passed
@edison1105 edison1105 deleted the vapor branch July 7, 2025 00:06
edison1105 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
@edison1105 edison1105 restored the vapor branch July 7, 2025 00:30
@edison1105 edison1105 mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2025
edison1105 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
@septatrix
Copy link

Was this merged on accident or why the revert?

@edison1105
Copy link
Member

I mistakenly chose squash merge, which caused the commit history to be lost. Therefore, I reverted it and have manually merged the vapor branch into minor. See d0cf234.

@edison1105 edison1105 deleted the vapor branch July 7, 2025 09:53
@MalaikaEdward
Copy link

Wow this is great work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
scope: vapor related to vapor mode
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants