Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial Changes #2

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2019
Merged

Editorial Changes #2

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 16, 2019

Conversation

wareid
Copy link
Contributor

@wareid wareid commented Apr 8, 2019

Per @iherman's wonderful recommendations, some changes and amendments to the audiobooks spec.

Per @iherman's wonderful recommendations, some changes and amendments to the audiobooks spec.
Copy link
Member

@mattgarrish mattgarrish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few minor comments. The only other thing I'd suggest would be to clean up the broken links. From experience, that's likely why the preview/diff aren't available, and lazy people like me have come to depend on those. :)

index.html Outdated
@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ <h1>Introduction</h1>

<p>This specification is a module of the <a>Web Publication</a> specification. It will describe the requirements to create an Audiobook profile of a Web Publication.</p>

<p>An Audiobook is defined as a collection of audio resources grouped together by a reading order, metadata, and resources, all contained in a manifest. This Audiobook can live on the Open Web Platform, or packaged using the <a href="https://w3c.github.io/wpub/index.htmlpackaged-web-publications">Packaged Web Publications</a> specification.</p>
<p>An Audiobook is defined as a collection of audio resources grouped together by a reading order, metadata, and resources, all contained in a manifest. This Audiobook can live on the Open Web Platform, or packaged using a specification to be determined by the Working Group.</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A minor word of caution would be to make "to be determined by the working group" an ednote, as writing it into the spec prose has a way of leading to it being forgotten over time.

index.html Outdated

<p>This specification is intended to bring clear standards to the audiobooks distribution model on the web. It should facilitate different user agent architectures for the consumption of Audiobooks. The primary goal is to bring clarity to a part of the publishing industry currently underserved by standards, while opening Audiobooks to the Open Web Platform and new user agents.</p>
<p>This specification is intended to bring clear standards to the audiobooks distribution model on the web and between businesses. It should facilitate different user agent architectures for the consumption of Audiobooks. The primary goal is to bring clarity to a part of the publishing industry currently underserved by standards, while opening Audiobooks to the Open Web Platform and new user agents.</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"clear standards" is one of those subjective kinds of claims that has a way of arousing passions. Just saying it "standardizes" might be all you need here.

index.html Outdated
<p>The table of contents is expressed via an [[html]]&#160;element (typically a <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/html/sections.html#the-nav-element"><code>nav</code> element</a>) in one of the <a href="https://w3c.github.io/wpub/indexwp-resources">resources</a>. This element MUST be identified by the <code>role</code> attribute&#160;[[html]] value "<code>doc-toc</code>"&#160;[[dpub-aria-1.0]], and MUST be the first element in the document &#8212; in <a href="https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-tree-order">document tree order</a>&#160;[[dom]] &#8212; with that <code>role</code> value.</p>

<p>If the table of contents is not located in the <a href="https://w3c.github.io/wpub/index#wp-primary-entry-page">primary entry page</a>, the manifest SHOULD <a href="#table-of-contents">identify the resource</a> that contains the structure.</p>
<p>The Web Publication specification [[wpub]] defines the <a href="https://w3c.github.io/wpub/index.html#wp-table-contents">general structure</a> of the Table of Contents, defined in HTML [[html]].</p>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit, but "define" is used twice in the sentence. I think you can just drop the comma and second instance so it reads "defines the general structure ... in HTML"

@mattgarrish
Copy link
Member

Although, it looks like there might be a bigger problem with pr-preview right now: tobie/pr-preview#30

Updating thanks to Matt's feedback :)
@wareid
Copy link
Contributor Author

wareid commented Apr 9, 2019

@mattgarrish I addressed your comments (and tried to tackle the links, but I will run it through the link checker again once merged).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants