You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As you know, there has been long discussion on "What should be included in the next Charter as the target for standardization." during and after the F2F meeting in Burlingame, and I'm very much confused about the current situation.
I'd like to discuss the rechartering topic with intention of including VIAS one of the targets for standardization during our telephone conferences in January.
In order to clarify what have been discussed so far and get a consensus about what to do for VIAS within the whole WG, the following "Disposition of Comments" paper has been summarized.
Any comments are appreciated.
[Disposition of Comments on VIAS1.0.docx]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have removed the doc file since it included excerpts of conversations made in member-automotive mailing list contrary to W3C's Member Confidentiality. A copy is being sent to the mailing list.
As you know, there has been long discussion on "What should be included in the next Charter as the target for standardization." during and after the F2F meeting in Burlingame, and I'm very much confused about the current situation.
I'd like to discuss the rechartering topic with intention of including VIAS one of the targets for standardization during our telephone conferences in January.
In order to clarify what have been discussed so far and get a consensus about what to do for VIAS within the whole WG, the following "Disposition of Comments" paper has been summarized.
Any comments are appreciated.
[Disposition of Comments on VIAS1.0.docx]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: