links that should point back to ARIA are now all broken in github.io editors draft

[spectranaut]

In the published editors draft: https://w3c.github.io/core-aam/

Any role or attribute link which used to go back to the ARIA spec now just adds a URL fragment to the role or attribute.

For example:

1. Click "aria-live" in this section: https://w3c.github.io/core-aam/#mapping_nodirect
2. Click "alert" in https://w3c.github.io/core-aam/#role-map-alert

[spectranaut]

Hey Michael -- I'm not sure why, but it looks like this recent change from you caused this breakage: ed79fdf

If I checkout out the commit before, the bug isn't there, so I tried your change to index.js line by line -- and its updating:

    specStatus:           "ED",

to

    specStatus:           "CRD",

That causes the links to break?? I'm pretty confused, I wonder if you understand why?

[jnurthen]

The document header needs a CRD entry for the ARIA specs so it knows where to point in that version.

    ariaSpecURLs: {
      "ED": "https://w3c.github.io/aria/",
      "WD" : "https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/",
      "CR" : "https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/",
      "CRD": "https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/",
      "PR" : "https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/",
      "REC": "https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/",
    },

The other entries also need updating. I think the above are the correct values.
The same needs to happen for the ACCNAME URLs too.

[spectranaut]

Shouldn't the main branch stay "ED", and a branch be add for CRD?

[jnurthen]

Shouldn't the main branch stay "ED", and a branch be add for CRD?

Why? Isn’t the whole point of evergreen that we push PRs to the real spec once they are merged?

[daniel-montalvo]

I can update those based on what we decide. I would say that it makes sense to have the main branch be the CRD branch as @jnurthen suggests.