-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[css-multicol] z-order of column rule and column scrolling #1739
Comments
An example so we can see how this currently behaves, use Firefox to see the overflowing item painted over the rule (existing clipping interop issue means you can't see that in other browsers) https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=269061#c19 https://codepen.io/rachelandrew/pen/OOXYZY?editors=1100 I think this is just a straightforward edit, as it seems to be what browsers are doing anyway. Relevant section of the spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-multicol-1/#column-gaps-and-rules |
The Working Group just discussed The full IRC log of that discussion<eae> Topic: z-order of column-rule and column scrolling<eae> github issue: https://github.com//issues/1739 |
The Working Group just discussed
The full IRC log of that discussion<Rossen> Topic: Multicolumn issues<Rossen> github: https://github.com//issues/1739 <eae> rachelandrew: These first three issues are ones I dig out from the mailing list archive. They're all quite old. <eae> rachelandrew: Things we've discussed, not sure what to do so brinng them up here. <eae> rachelandrew: First one. z-order for column scrolling. <eae> rachelandrew: Suggested change to wording. <eae> rachelandrew: Is this something we want to add into the spec or do we need to dicuss it? <eae> florian: Do we have interop on the proposed wording? <eae> rachelandrew: There is an issue with overflow which as resolved a while ago, interop on the issue across browsers as far as I can tell. <eae> rachelandrew: Firefox does not support spanning. <eae> Rossen: Firefox is different due to that. <eae> rachelandrew: Right, relating to the fact that thay haven't implemented it. <eae> florian: The things that is linked to is not a minimized test case. Is an example. <eae> rachelandrew: Correct. <eae> Proposed resolution: Apply proposed edit from Oct 2013 to spec. <bkardell_> sfbay <eae> florian: A minimal test case would be good, but I'm fine with it. <eae> Rossen: There is one in the github issue <eae> rachelandrew: I'll add a test as part of spec change. <eae> florian: I volunteer to review it. <eae> RESOLVED: Apply proposed edit from Oct 2013 to spec. |
In Column Gaps and Rules is the text:
This was added due to the resolution of Feb 2013
There is a discussion in October 2013 suggesting a change to this wording, plus the addition of a clarification re: scrolling:
I don't see any resolution to this discussion, it doesn't seem to have been edited into the spec. Posting it here as an open issue.
This is one of a list of legacy issues I'm digging out of the www-style archives.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: