You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The (now superseded) DOM Level 2 Style specification defined a different variant of this rule. This definition supersedes that one.
DOM Level 2 defines the exact same interface.
This commit defined CSSFontFaceRule descriptors as attributes with the above sentence. This commit removed the attributes but not the above sentence.
I do noy know how CSSFontFaceRule.style is supposed to work but this sentence could be replaced by an issue saying it is under consideration.
I guess it depends on #5649 but more recent at-rules seem to have been defined with descriptors as attributes, whereas #5649 resolved on defining different interfaces for declarations blocks that expose a different set of descriptors/properties.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for spotting. The sentence is indeed leftover from the time a different interface was in CSS Fonts 3, and then moved over to 4, before being deleted and replaced by the actually-implemented one from DOM 2.
I think this sentence is an oversight in
CSSFontFaceRule
definition:DOM Level 2 defines the exact same interface.
This commit defined
CSSFontFaceRule
descriptors as attributes with the above sentence. This commit removed the attributes but not the above sentence.I do noy know how
CSSFontFaceRule.style
is supposed to work but this sentence could be replaced by an issue saying it is under consideration.I guess it depends on #5649 but more recent at-rules seem to have been defined with descriptors as attributes, whereas #5649 resolved on defining different interfaces for declarations blocks that expose a different set of descriptors/properties.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: