Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add note to describe DAPT implementation types #245

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

cconcolato
Copy link
Contributor

@cconcolato cconcolato commented Sep 26, 2024

closes #44


Preview | Diff

index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated
would be considered a transformation processor. It may also be considered as
a presentation processor if it does any form of rendering of the text or the audio.</li>
<li>A DAPT tool that would indicate if a DAPT document is compliant to this specification
would correspond to a validation processor.</li>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Link to the TTML2 term definition?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will do

@cconcolato cconcolato merged commit 1a836ea into main Sep 28, 2024
2 checks passed
@cconcolato cconcolato deleted the issue-0044-dapt-processors branch September 28, 2024 00:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Define DAPT-specific conformant implementation types
2 participants