Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relationship between controller property and DID controller #326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2020

Conversation

rhiaro
Copy link
Member

@rhiaro rhiaro commented Jun 21, 2020

Issue #122 has a lot of back-and-forth about the relationship between the controller property and the actual DID controller, aka the entity that can edit the DID document.

The original issue was about whether we can assume the DID subject (aka an entity that can authenticate itself with verification material contained in the DID doc.. I think?) is default controller in the absence of a controller property. (Short answer to that being 'no'.)

I'm not sure there's consensus, so I've added a NOTE presenting one set of perspectives from that thread, which is basically that the controller property is indicative but ultimately who/what can or cannot edit a DID doc, and under what circumstances, is up to the DID method, controller property or no.

I'm not sure if there's normative language to be developed from this, happy to iterate.

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jun 22, 2020

See:

Copy link
Member

@msporny msporny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Editorial, multiple positive reviews, changes requested and made, no objections, merging.

@msporny msporny merged commit e0b71cb into master Jul 3, 2020
@msporny msporny deleted the rhiaro-122-controller branch July 3, 2020 15:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants