Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define sameAs #80

Closed
OR13 opened this issue Jul 2, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Define sameAs #80

OR13 opened this issue Jul 2, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor

OR13 commented Jul 2, 2020

w3c-ccg/security-vocab#45
^ related to... won't attempt to implement until thats done.
Cross linking: w3c/did-core#33

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Aug 7, 2020

Proposing moving this to DID Core, and discussing it as it related to "representations" / "dereferencing" and existing "knowledge management systems".

@rhiaro
Copy link
Member

rhiaro commented Aug 24, 2020

I think sameAs can be added to the Registries with a link to the definition in OWL vocab (my understanding is this is the intended definition) but doesn't need to be defined again in DID Core.

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Aug 25, 2020

@rhiaro should the did spec registries note that owl:Thing is the base class for verification method types like https://w3c-ccg.github.io/security-vocab/#Ed25519VerificationKey2018
?

@kdenhartog
Copy link
Member

Rather than moving this issue to did-core can we merge it into w3c/did-core#421 Happy to transfer if you'd like though @OR13

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Nov 12, 2020

@kdenhartog I suggest leaving it open until ^ that PR is merged or defeated, it will either get defined in did core and we will need to define sameAs here, or it will get defeated and we will close this eventually.

@kdenhartog
Copy link
Member

This can be closed now that w3c/did-core#473 has been merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants