Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial changes in view of DCAT3 4PWD #1471

Closed
4 tasks done
andrea-perego opened this issue Feb 28, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed
4 tasks done

Editorial changes in view of DCAT3 4PWD #1471

andrea-perego opened this issue Feb 28, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor

andrea-perego commented Feb 28, 2022

@andrea-perego andrea-perego added this to the DCAT3 4PWD milestone Feb 28, 2022
andrea-perego added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2022
@andrea-perego andrea-perego changed the title Editorial changes in view of FPWD Editorial changes in view of DCAT3 4PWD Mar 7, 2022
@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

The editor’s note in section https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#inverse-properties says

The list of properties in the following table is yet to be consolidated, and it includes also properties currently defined in 6. Vocabulary specification.

Can we consider the list consolidated?
In any case, I do not think we have any inverse properties that have been left in section 6

I would consider removing the note. What do the other editors think?

@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

@riccardoAlbertoni said:

The editor’s note in section https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#inverse-properties says

The list of properties in the following table is yet to be consolidated, and it includes also properties currently defined in 6. Vocabulary specification.

Can we consider the list consolidated? In any case, I do not think we have any inverse properties that have been left in section 6

I would consider removing the note. What do the other editors think?

I think there's yet a property to be added, i.e., dcat:inCatalog, inverse of dcat:resource. After that, I would agree to remove the EDNOTE.

@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

I think there's yet a property to be added, i.e., dcat:inCatalog, inverse of dcat:resource. After that, I would agree to remove the EDNOTE.

Changes are done via #1485

@riccardoAlbertoni riccardoAlbertoni added the due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days label Apr 26, 2022
@andrea-perego andrea-perego removed the due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days label Jun 2, 2022
@andrea-perego
Copy link
Contributor Author

I moved planned revisions on RDF files to #1509

Closing this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants