Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Advisability of alternative method of content negotiation #594

Closed
nicholascar opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Advisability of alternative method of content negotiation #594

nicholascar opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@nicholascar
Labels
due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days profile-negotiation
Milestone
Conneg 3PWD

Comments

@nicholascar
Copy link
Contributor

There is a question within the working group regarding the advisability of specifying an alternative method of content negotiation conducted via query strings rather than HTTP headers. We have a requirement to show how datasets with different profiles can be made discoverable by humans, but there is disagreement whether this requirement extends to implementing the same negotiation scheme used in HTTP headers.
@nicholascar nicholascar self-assigned this Nov 16, 2018
@nicholascar nicholascar changed the title Viability of alternative method of content negotiation Advisability of alternative method of content negotiation Nov 16, 2018
larsgsvensson added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 16, 2018
@larsgsvensson
Updated note on QSA not necessarily being content negotiation
4008a4c 
Changed issue #594 to #544 
Added [Annette's proposed text](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dxwg-wg/2018Nov/0544.html) as text for the note
@nicholascar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ref Issue https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/544 for details on specific objections.

@nicholascar nicholascar added this to the Conneg 3PWD milestone May 9, 2019
@nicholascar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing issue due to document having moved on with relevant explanations

@larsgsvensson larsgsvensson reopened this May 9, 2019
@larsgsvensson larsgsvensson added the due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days label May 9, 2019
@nicholascar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Issue closed after removal of it from document, 2 months after due for closing label applied and no changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nicholascar nicholascar

Labels
due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days profile-negotiation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Conneg 3PWD
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@larsgsvensson @nicholascar