UCR: Re-phrase description of UC26

[andrea-perego]

Ref: https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID26

The UC description currently reads as follows:

Considering DCAT a high-level model for data exchange agree on significant aspects missing so far and define extension points (typically properties) for re-use and integration of existing standards, application profiles etc. The reference listing of aspects deemed relevant is based on evaluation of DXWG use cases and [ISO-19115-1]:

@jpullmann , the first sentence sounds wrong (something missing?), and should be re-phrased. A minimal revision could be (please note also the added commas):

Considering DCAT a high-level model for data exchange, it would be important to agree on significant aspects missing so far and define extension points (typically properties) for re-use and integration of existing standards, application profiles, etc.

[jpullmann]

@andrea-perego This sentence reads like a requirement (imperative), will update in suggested way, thanks!

[andrea-perego]

Thanks, @jpullmann !

I wonder whether we should add a milestone for the 3rd PWD of the UCR document...

[jpullmann]

resolved by commit 4aa3a09