Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of doc updated #1087

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 19, 2019
Merged

Status of doc updated #1087

merged 5 commits into from
Sep 19, 2019

Conversation

davebrowning
Copy link
Contributor

@davebrowning davebrowning commented Sep 19, 2019

Addresses #1084 and a small change to remove the word 'draft' in the intro, so it remains accurate for CR/PR/REC (hopefully.)

And a small change to remove the word 'draft' in the intro, so it remains accurate for CR/PR/REC (hopefully.)
@davebrowning
Copy link
Contributor Author

@@ -30,8 +30,10 @@
<section id="sotd">

<p>
Since the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/WD-vocab-dcat-2-20180508/">First Public Working Draft</a>, the main changes to the DCAT vocabulary have been:</p>
This document defines a major revision of the original DCAT vocabulary ([[?VOCAB-DCAT-20140116]]) in response to new use cases, requirements and community experience since that publication. This revision extends the original DCAT standard in line with community practice while supporting diverse approaches to data description and dataset exchange.
</p>
Copy link
Contributor

@riccardoAlbertoni riccardoAlbertoni Sep 19, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would add

Suggested change
</p>
The main changes to the DCAT vocabulary have been: </p>

Or a similar sentence to introduce the item list

@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair merged commit 7b964a5 into gh-pages Sep 19, 2019
@dr-shorthair dr-shorthair deleted the dcat-sotd-cr-text branch September 19, 2019 23:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants