Revision to the versioning section #1257
Conversation
|
Many thanks for preparing this, @andrea-perego . After we have solved my revisions, I think we will be ready to change the pull's status, making it ready for other editors' review. |
Co-authored-by: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Co-authored-by: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Co-authored-by: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Co-authored-by: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Thanks, @riccardoAlbertoni . Just accepted your changes. |
…sue note with reference to related github issue
|
@riccardoAlbertoni , I tried to add the issue summary section and issue #1258 . The issue box seems to show up correctly: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-versioning/dcat/#issue-container-number-1258 However, the issue summary section seems to have some rendering issues. You can see it right before the introduction: https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-versioning/dcat/#introduction This may be a bug in the new ReSpec library. I'll raise an issue in the ReSpec repo. |
|
Added links to relevant issues (as decided during the DCAT subgroup call). Please have a check. Then, I think we can mark this PR as ready for review. |
andrea-perego
requested review from
agbeltran,
davebrowning and
dr-shorthair
|
@andrea-perego: I've checked this, and I think we can have this PR as ready for review. Many thanks. |
Thanks, @riccardoAlbertoni . |
|
Just for our records, the issue I reported in #1257 (comment) has been fixed - see https://github.com/w3c/respec/pull/3152 |
Very first draft.
Preview here:
https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/dcat-versioning/dcat/#dataset-versions
Related action: ACTION-430
See also: https://www.w3.org/2020/09/16-dxwgdcat-minutes#a01