Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Privacy: Implementations that support modes with and without distinctive identifiers SHOULD expose this to the user #243

Closed
ddorwin opened this issue Jun 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@ddorwin
Copy link
Contributor

ddorwin commented Jun 10, 2016

The spec already says:

Implementations that use Distinctive Identifier(s) or Distinctive Permanent Identifier(s) SHOULD support the option to not use them.

I propose adding:

Implementations with such support SHOULD expose the ability for the user to select this option.

@ddorwin ddorwin added this to the V1NonBlocking milestone Jun 10, 2016
@ddorwin ddorwin changed the title Implementations that support modes with and without distinctive identifiers SHOULD expose this to the user Privacy: Implementations that support modes with and without distinctive identifiers SHOULD expose this to the user Jun 10, 2016
ddorwin added a commit to ddorwin/encrypted-media that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2016
@ddorwin ddorwin self-assigned this Jun 24, 2016
@ddorwin
Copy link
Contributor Author

ddorwin commented Jun 24, 2016

PR #258.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant