Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge timeOrigin into Level 2 #51

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 27, 2017
Merged

Merge timeOrigin into Level 2 #51

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 27, 2017

Conversation

igrigorik
Copy link
Member

@igrigorik igrigorik commented Jul 27, 2017

Per discussion in [1], merging timeOrigin back into Level 2 and dropping
Level 3. We'll need to republish new CR.

[1]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2017Jul/0010.html


Preview | Diff

Per discussion in [1], merging timeOrigin back into Level 2 and dropping
Level 3. We'll need to republish new CR.

[1]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2017Jul/0010.html
@igrigorik igrigorik added this to the Level 2 milestone Jul 27, 2017
@igrigorik igrigorik requested a review from siusin July 27, 2017 05:56
Copy link
Contributor

@siusin siusin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM except for a minor fix.

index.html Outdated
shortName: "hr-time-3",
specStatus: "ED",
shortName: "hr-time-2",
specStatus: "WD",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to change the specStatus here...

The auto-pub system will stop working once we re-publish the CR and drop Level 3. The group is encouraged to maintain the future changes in the editor's draft (w3c.github.io/hr-time/) . The process to update the CR for future editorial changes is pretty simple, although it's not allowed in the auto-pub system yet. Please ping plh or me for the future hr-time publication when needed.

@siusin
Copy link
Contributor

siusin commented Jul 27, 2017

Thanks @igrigorik .

I'll start the CR update transition, and publish the Level 3 as a WG-NOTE (the group can revive it as a WD any time in the future).

@igrigorik
Copy link
Member Author

@siusin reverted specStatus. Re, your comment above, to confirm that I'm following:

  • You'll republish L3 as a note; we should add a disclaimer that it's not actively worked on and developers should refer to L2?
  • One this PR lands, the L2 status is back to ED and it will republish automatically, right?
    • Once we agree to move L2 to CR (again), you'll publish manually.

Does that sound about right?

@siusin
Copy link
Contributor

siusin commented Jul 27, 2017

@igrigorik thanks!

re L3,

  • yes, we will also make /TR/hr-time point to /TR/hr-time-2.

re L2,

  • w3c.github.io/hr-time/ will be the editor's draft of L2, once we merge this PR, it'll be updated automatically by GitHub whenever people commit to the repo.
  • /TR/hr-time-2 will point to the new CR of L2, if the group wants to make changes to the document at /TR/hr-time-2 in the future, I'll publish a new CR manually.

Does it make sense?

@siusin siusin merged commit 179cbb1 into gh-pages Jul 27, 2017
@igrigorik
Copy link
Member Author

yes, we will also make /TR/hr-time point to /TR/hr-time-2.

Great!

w3c.github.io/hr-time/ will be the editor's draft of L2, once we merge this PR, it'll be updated automatically by GitHub whenever people commit to the repo.

Yep, confirmed: https://w3c.github.io/hr-time/

/TR/hr-time-2 will point to the new CR of L2, if the group wants to make changes to the document at /TR/hr-time-2 in the future, I'll publish a new CR manually.

TR is pointing to old (Nov 2016) draft. You'll republish new ED version as CR?

@siusin
Copy link
Contributor

siusin commented Jul 27, 2017

TR is pointing to old (Nov 2016) draft. You'll republish new ED version as CR?

Yes, we'll need a Director's approval this time because we are updating an existing Candidate Recommendation with substantive changes, which may take several days. For the future editorial changes, we just need to send a publication-request and update the CR directly.

@igrigorik
Copy link
Member Author

Gotcha, makes sense. I think we're all set then. Let's get the CR republished, and on the next call we can discuss what the next steps are for moving this spec forward.

/cc @toddreifsteck fyi.

@plehegar plehegar deleted the l2 branch March 13, 2018 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants