Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 30, 2019. It is now read-only.

Check status of <link rel=serviceworker> #821

Closed
sideshowbarker opened this issue Mar 17, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Check status of <link rel=serviceworker> #821

sideshowbarker opened this issue Mar 17, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@sideshowbarker
Copy link
Contributor

The <link rel=serviceworker> link type needs to be defined, along with the associated scope, workertype, and usecache content attributes, and the corresponding scope, workerType, and useCache IDL attributes need to be added to the HTMLLinkElement interface definition.

whatwg/html@c5d4f5c

@travisleithead
Copy link
Member

Wait for #822's PR #852 before starting this--the refactoring will put this in the right spot and be easier to merge.

@travisleithead
Copy link
Member

Checked with our Service Worker team, and learned that this feature is not yet deployed generally in Chrome (origin trial only: https://www.chromestatus.com/features/5682681044008960), and is not supported in any other UA at the moment. Given this status, it would be inappropriate to land this feature in HTML for 5.2. We should consider adopting this in once it's available for testing publicly, perhaps in the 5.3 timeframe.

Dropped "match reality better" as this isn't true, and dropped high-priority, as this doesn't seem to apply to future HTML5 milestones.

@chaals chaals changed the title Add <link rel=serviceworker>+associated attributes Check status of <link rel=serviceworker> Feb 13, 2018
@chaals chaals modified the milestones: When it's ready, HTML5.3 WD4 Feb 13, 2018
@chaals
Copy link
Collaborator

chaals commented Feb 13, 2018

This should be checked again in time to get it in for wide review if there is uptake.

@patricia-gallardo
Copy link
Contributor

@travisleithead postponed intake last year waiting on other UAs - however Chrome seems also to have dropped this as of March 2018 : https://www.chromestatus.com/features/5682681044008960

"Add support for LINK rel=serviceworker as an element and header to allow the installation of Service Worker declarative in a document or via a header.
Update (2018-03-26): This was removed from the specification and is no longer being pursued."

Therefore closing the issue.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants