Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[articles/typography/linebreak] Is it worth noting other downsides of manual entry ZWSP? #157

Closed
mcdurdin opened this issue Jun 18, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@mcdurdin
Copy link

[source] (http://w3c.github.io/i18n-drafts/articles/typography/linebreak.en) [en]

It has been suggested that the Unicode character U+200B ZERO WIDTH SPACE could be useful to indicate word boundaries, but people writing these languages don’t use it.

Manual entry of ZWSP is not very practical because the user cannot see the separator in most scenarios. This leads to problems with ZWSP being inserted in the wrong position, or multiple times. Despite this, some standard keyboards such as Khmer NIDA still generate ZWSP with the Spacebar key. In fact, it has been suggested that word wrap algorithms ignore ZWSP for Khmer text because of data quality issues (sorry, I have been unable to locate where I saw this).

r12a added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 18, 2018
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Jun 18, 2018

Thanks @mcdurdin. I added some of this text to the article.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants