Exttraneous paragraph

The discussions of review of rec-track work seem extraneous, since the group has committed not to doing such work.

charters/charter-2021.html

@@ -280,13 +280,7 @@ <h3>Timeline</h3>
 
       <section id="coordination">
         <h2>Coordination</h2>
-        <p>For all specifications, this
-          Interest Group will seek <a href="https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/#how_to_get_horizontal_review">horizontal review</a> for accessibility, internationalization, performance, privacy, and security with the relevant Working and Interest Groups, and with the <a href="https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/" title="Technical Architecture Group">TAG</a>.
-          Invitation for review must be issued during each major standards-track document transition, including <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#RecsWD" title="First Public Working Draft">FPWD</a>.
-          The Interest Group is encouraged to engage collaboratively with the horizontal review groups throughout the development of each specification.
-          The Interest Group is advised to seek a review at least 3 months before first entering <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#RecsCR" title="Candidate Recommendation">CR</a> and is encouraged to proactively notify the horizontal review groups when major changes occur in a specification following a review.</p>
-
-        <p>The scope of the Media and Entertainment Interest Group includes
+           <p>The scope of the Media and Entertainment Interest Group includes
           tracking and review of media-related deliverables developed by other
           W3C groups, as well as coordination with other organizations in the
           media industry. As such, the Media and Entertainment Interest Group intends to