Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #103: Add explicit normative reference for Performance.now() #112

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2016
Merged

Fix #103: Add explicit normative reference for Performance.now() #112

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2016

Conversation

wolenetz
Copy link
Member

Though the underlying [[HR-TIME]] reference is strangely a WD of
hr-time-2 currently, this is due to hr-time publication and not an MSE
spec regression. The normative reference is a link to the same document
as the already existing link in the MSE spec for Performance.now().

@wolenetz
Copy link
Member Author

@jdsmith3000 Please take a look. See also #103 (comment). Thanks!

@wolenetz wolenetz changed the title Fix 103: Add explicit normative reference for Performance.now() Fix #103: Add explicit normative reference for Performance.now() Jul 12, 2016
@wolenetz
Copy link
Member Author

@jdsmith3000 friendly ping

@wolenetz
Copy link
Member Author

@jdsmith3000 please review this

@wolenetz
Copy link
Member Author

I'll land this later today, barring any objections raised before then.

Though the underlying [[HR-TIME]] reference is strangely a WD of
hr-time-2 currently, this is due to hr-time publication and not an MSE
spec regression. The normative reference is a link to the same document
as the already existing link in the MSE spec for Performance.now().
@wolenetz wolenetz merged commit 8aa1278 into w3c:gh-pages Jul 25, 2016
@wolenetz wolenetz deleted the fix_103 branch July 25, 2016 20:04
@jdsmith3000
Copy link
Contributor

Post merge: LGTM.

@wolenetz
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants