Support for RCH WG

[gkellogg]

I support creation of this working group. I have implemented The Dataset Canonicalization specification and feel that it is of general import to the Linked Data/RDF ecosystem. Canonicalization is a necessary component for creating a digital signature, but useful and of itself for a number of RDF use cases.

[iherman]

Thanks @gkellogg. I would love to see you on that group... (and elsewhere:-)

[pchampin]

Dear @gkellogg,
the proposed charter has been substantially changed since you submitted your expression of support. More specifically, its scoped has been narrowed down, to address some concerns raised in the Semantic Web community. See also Ivan Herman's explanation of those changes on the SebWeb mailing list.

We kindly ask you to review the new version, and either

• renew your expression of interest (by a simple reply to this thread), or
• to close this issue if you do not wish to renew it.

Thanks in advance

[gkellogg]

I continue to support the creation of the Working Group. Gregg Kellogg

…

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 1, 2022, at 8:47 AM, Pierre-Antoine Champin ***@***.***> wrote:  Dear @gkellogg, the proposed charter has been substantially changed since you submitted your expression of support. More specifically, its scoped has been narrowed down, to address some concerns raised in the Semantic Web community. See also Ivan Herman's explanation of those changes on the SebWeb mailing list. We kindly ask you to review the new version, and either renew your expression of interest (by a simple reply to this thread), or to close this issue if you do not wish to renew it. Thanks in advance — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

[pchampin]

For the sake of clarity, editing the title to match the new name of the WG...