Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Normative CSS2 reference changed to CSS2.1 in Second Edition #237

Closed
palemieux opened this issue Apr 20, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Normative CSS2 reference changed to CSS2.1 in Second Edition #237

palemieux opened this issue Apr 20, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor

The reference to CSS2 in Second Edition changed from:

Bert Bos et al., Cascading Style Sheets, Level 2, W3C Recommendation, 12 May 1998. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2-19980512/.)

to

Bert Bos et al., Cascading Style Sheets, Level 2 Revision 1, W3C Recommendation, 07 June 2011. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-CSS2-20110607/.)

Two issues:

  • there were normative changes between the two CSS versions, e.g. "16.6.1 The 'white-space' processing model" introduced in CSS2.1
  • Second Edition continues to reference XSL 1.1, which references CSS2

Proposed resolution:

  • revert normative reference to CSS2
@palemieux palemieux added the bug label Apr 20, 2017
@palemieux palemieux added this to the 3rd Ed milestone Apr 20, 2017
@palemieux palemieux self-assigned this Apr 20, 2017
@palemieux palemieux changed the title Normative CSS2 reference erroneously changed to CSS2.1 in Second Edition Normative CSS2 reference changed to CSS2.1 in Second Edition Apr 20, 2017
@skynavga skynavga added question and removed bug labels Apr 24, 2017
@skynavga
Copy link
Contributor

There is no bug here. TTML1 2nd Ed references CSS2.1. TTML1 also references XSL-FO 1.1, which references CSS2. So depending on the route to the specific reference, either CSS2.1 or CSS2 applies.

@skynavga
Copy link
Contributor

Committed in #238.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants