Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tts:writingMode example is not helpful #269

Closed
aphillips opened this issue Feb 27, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

tts:writingMode example is not helpful #269

aphillips opened this issue Feb 27, 2017 · 9 comments
Labels
editorial horizontal review comment i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. pr merged wg accepted
Milestone

Comments

@aphillips
Copy link

https://w3c.github.io/ttml2/spec/ttml2.html#style-attribute-writingMode

The illustration of the rltb writing mode uses unicodeBidi override and direction=rtl to show some English text backwards. This isn't particularly helpful, since it isn't really an effect of writing mode and non-observant readers may not realize that the example has these features turned on in the example. They might therefore attribute the RTL results to the writing mode. I would instead suggest showing the text strongly right aligned, possibly in conjunction with an Arabic or Hebrew translation.

@r12a r12a added the i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. label Feb 27, 2017
@dae-kim
Copy link
Contributor

dae-kim commented Mar 3, 2017

I'm not opposed to this suggestion but would like to point out the Note below the illustration:

"In the second paragraph in the above example that targets region r2, the tts:unicodeBidi and tts:direction properties are set to bidiOverride and rtl, respectively, in order to override the normally left-to-right directionality of characters in the Latin script."

@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor

See also #266

@palemieux palemieux added this to the TTML2WR milestone Apr 27, 2017
@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor

@dae-kim and @aphillips Please review the revised example at writingMode-example.ttml.zip, which is intended to replace the tts:writingMode example.

@palemieux palemieux added for review and removed i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. labels Apr 27, 2017
@palemieux palemieux assigned palemieux and unassigned aphillips and dae-kim Apr 27, 2017
@palemieux palemieux added the i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. label Apr 27, 2017
@r12a
Copy link

r12a commented May 3, 2017

@palemieux those examples look better to me, thanks. (Still a little western biased because they start with Latin text, but that's probably ok, since it may help people not so familiar with the other scripts.) However the Japanese 万人 is a bit odd. You probably want to use みなさん、こんにちは instead.

@r12a
Copy link

r12a commented May 3, 2017

[OT] Btw, in case it's helpful some time, i have a set of short phrases that can be used as examples at http://r12a.github.io/scripts/phrases

@dae-kim
Copy link
Contributor

dae-kim commented May 3, 2017

Looks good to me. With or without the Japanese edit.

@palemieux
Copy link
Contributor

Attached is a revised example I plan to use as basis for the PR.
writingMode010.ttml.zip

@r12a
Copy link

r12a commented Aug 17, 2017

Thank you for considering this issue. The i18n WG is now closing the pointer to this issue in its review tracker.

@skynavga skynavga added this to the Editor's CR Work List milestone Aug 21, 2017
@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The Working Group just discussed ttml2#269 tts:writingMode example is not helpful, and agreed to the following resolutions:

  • SUMMARY: No further action to take (WG already agreed disposition)
The full IRC log of that discussion <nigel> Topic: ttml2#269 tts:writingMode example is not helpful
<nigel> github: https://github.com//issues/269
<nigel> Nigel: Pierre proposed a fix for this which was merged, and also added it to imsc-tests.
<nigel> Glenn: We did those updates and i18n closed this in their tracker.
<nigel> .. We closed this back on May 6
<nigel> Nigel: Oh yes we probably shouldn't have since it was an HR comment.
<nigel> SUMMARY: No further action to take (WG already agreed disposition)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial horizontal review comment i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. pr merged wg accepted
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants