Review by APA WG.

[tmichel07]

Comment sent by Janina Sajka janina@rednote.net
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:31:33 -0400
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tt/2017Sep/0083.html

Dear Thierry, All:

APA has reviewed this specification and found no issues. We do want to
express our thanks for your solid support of the accessibility features
enumerated in our Media Access User Requirements (MAUR) note.

Janina Sajka, APA Chair

[tmichel07]

This one was cool ;-)

[skynavga]

No action required, so closing.

[nigelmegitt]

@tmichel07 is it okay for this to be closed, in your process, or do you need it to stay open but be labelled? I agree with @skynavga that there's no action required, other than to make sure we report this in the dispositions when we request transition to CR.

[tmichel07]

I am fine with closing issues when these are done. But we should adopt this for all isses (commenter accepted, etc.) if we think we are done. We will track WR labels in the closed issues for the disposition of comments. Le 02/10/2017 à 18:25, Nigel Megitt a écrit :

…

@tmichel07 <https://github.com/tmichel07> is it okay for this to be closed, in your process, or do you need it to stay open but be labelled? I agree with @skynavga <https://github.com/skynavga> that there's no action required, other than to make sure we report this in the dispositions when we request transition to CR. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#445 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGiYfm7B-jvLwZSma1r__TNSNjqOQ0sEks5soQ5zgaJpZM4PqbX7>.

[skynavga]

I think the WR-commenter-rejected label was added in error; or at lease I have no record of a rejection. I am removing it now. If there was a rejection, then it may be re-labeled as such, but in that case will need a citation of such a rejection (in email, etc).