Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ARIB review of TTML2 #452

Closed
tmichel07 opened this issue Oct 3, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

ARIB review of TTML2 #452

tmichel07 opened this issue Oct 3, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
wide review comment WR-commenter-agreed WR-resolved

Comments

@tmichel07
Copy link
Contributor

tmichel07 commented Oct 3, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Comment sent by Shinya Takeuchi takeuchi.s-js@nhk.or.jp
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:53:48 +0900

Please do NOT discuss this issue on github, this email is not public.

For your convenience I have forwarded the email to W3C member restricted space
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-tt/2017Oct/0005.html
@skynavga
Copy link
Collaborator

skynavga commented Oct 3, 2017

Having reviewed the comments, there is no actionable issue indicated (either substantive or editorial), so I am closing with no action and marking as WR-resolved-no-action.

@skynavga skynavga closed this as completed Oct 3, 2017
@skynavga skynavga added this to the Editor's CR Work List milestone Oct 3, 2017
@skynavga skynavga reopened this Oct 3, 2017
@skynavga skynavga removed this from the Editor's CR Work List milestone Oct 3, 2017
@skynavga
Copy link
Collaborator

skynavga commented Oct 3, 2017

Recommend resolving this with WR-resolved-noted status.

@nigelmegitt
Copy link
Contributor

I agree @skynavga . There seems to be no actionable comment other than to note it.

@skynavga skynavga added the agenda label Jan 8, 2018
@css-meeting-bot
Copy link
Member

The Working Group just discussed ARIB review of TTML2 ttml2#452, and agreed to the following resolutions:

  • RESOLUTION: Mark as WR-Resolved and WR-commenter-agreed since no response was required but the comment did not show misaligned functions.
The full IRC log of that discussion <nigel> Topic: ARIB review of TTML2 ttml2#452
<nigel> github: https://github.com//issues/452
<nigel> Pierre: When we move to CR, in the case of ARIB if there are features they expressed an
<nigel> .. interest in that are at risk we should tell them, since they may want to provide implementations.
<nigel> RESOLUTION: Mark as WR-Resolved and WR-commenter-agreed since no response was required but the comment did not show misaligned functions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
wide review comment WR-commenter-agreed WR-resolved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@skynavga @nigelmegitt @tmichel07 @css-meeting-bot