Apply additional style properties to tt:image, allow @style on tt:image (#232).

[skynavga]

See #232.

[nigelmegitt]

This introduces the idea that style applies to image, but not that such a style can be animated. Should the set element be permitted as a child of image? Similarly should the animate attribute be permitted on image elements?
Or is there a strong reason why image is an exception and is a "stylable" element whose style may not be animated?

[skynavga]

Good points. I'll add.

…

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Nigel Megitt ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. This introduces the idea that style applies to image, but not that such a style can be animated. Should the set element be permitted as a child of image? Similarly should the animate attribute be permitted on image elements? Or is there a strong reason why image is an exception and is a "stylable" element whose style may not be animated? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#234 (review)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXCb7whQWlMEMHHz1A5twp2il77oy4Qks5rUI5agaJpZM4LooEi> .