You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my opinion the Freedonia pseudo-anonymity is a key example for 4.2, in terms of “restrict the amount of information exposed in the claim” as 4.2 states. Pseudo-anonymity involves withholding the person’s real legal name, which is perhaps the most important piece of data that can be withheld.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
How explicit should we be in the DM about issuer’s role in creating ZKP credentials for things like withholding “name” as discussed in the use cases section 3.5. https://w3c.github.io/vc-use-cases/#professional-credentials item C.5 Social authority
in other words, can I say “I’m in control of credential X in which I’m the subject, but you can’t know who I really am”
I'm opening this question in the data model repo also.
@jandrieu@stonematt - #17 appears to have been closed without being merged? At least, github doesn't say it was merged. So I'm not sure this (#10) should have been closed as addressed there (#17).
Sec 4.2: Add to ‘Needs’: “C.5 Social Authority: Freedonia” with link to the second example in C.5, Freedonia.
In my opinion the Freedonia pseudo-anonymity is a key example for 4.2, in terms of “restrict the amount of information exposed in the claim” as 4.2 states. Pseudo-anonymity involves withholding the person’s real legal name, which is perhaps the most important piece of data that can be withheld.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: