update diagrams

[stonematt]

review for terminology and update for accuracy if needed.

[msporny]

There are a number of terminology issues under discussion in the VC 2.0 WG: https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/labels/terminology ... just cross-linking for more info.

[Sakurann]

pending-close unless big issues that needs to be updated are identified.

[iherman]

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2023-02-07

• no resolutions were taken

View the transcript

1.6. update diagrams (issue vc-use-cases#109)

See github issue vc-use-cases#109.

Kristina Yasuda: which diagram does this involve?.
… the needs map..
… in section 3? user needs?.

Joe Andrieu: not sure what needs to be updated there..
… if that diagram is out of sync with the following text, but it looks like a general review.

Kristina Yasuda: this is from 2019.

Joe Andrieu: not clear if this identifies specific issues..

Kristina Yasuda: do we need to update or can we close?.

Joe Andrieu: let's mark pending close and ask Matt.

Kristina Yasuda: I'll mark pending close.

Manu Sporny: just cross linking to the terminology discussions, but I'm fine with this being closed..
… we're talking terminology in the main use case.

Kristina Yasuda: maybe we need an issue to align terminology.

Manu Sporny: unless this is actionable, we should close it.
… an open issue to always keep the terminology in sync will never close.

Manu Sporny: +1 to depending on Kevin, rather than a Github issue :P.

Joe Andrieu: Kevin has been closely reviewing the Use Cases document and I think we'll catch things..

Kristina Yasuda: let's close it in a week or so.

[jandrieu]

we'll update the diagram when when we add "validate claim" as a task.