Skip to content
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion index.html
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1942,7 +1942,7 @@ <h4 id="maturity-levels">6.1.2 Maturity Levels</h4>
be restored to Recommendation Status. See also clause 10 of the licensing requirements for W3C Recommendations in
<a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy#sec-Requirements">section 5</a> of the
<a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy" data-ref="PUB33">W3C Patent Policy</a>.</dd>
<dt id="WGNote">Working Group Note, Interest Group Note (NOTE) </dt>
<dt id="WGNote">Working Group Note, Interest Group Note (<abbr title="Internet Relay Chat">NOTE</abbr>) </dt>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

title="Internet Relay Chat" looks like a copy+paste mistake.

If we want to use abbr, I think we should change the whole line to:

<dt id="WGNote"><abbr title="Working Group Note, Interest Group Note">NOTE</abbr>) </dt>

and do the same for every other entry in the list. (REC, CR, WD...).

At the same time, leaving this as-is seems fine to me.

What I think we should really do is convert the whole document to bikeshed, and use its facilities for defining and cross referencing terms.

<dd>A Working Group Note or Interest Group Note is published by a chartered Working Group or Interest Group to provide
a stable reference for a useful document that is not intended to be a formal standard, or to document work that was
abandoned without producing a Recommendation.</dd>
Expand Down