Clear split between requirements for rule authors vs. rule implementers

[annethyme]

These sections are as the only ones in the ACT Rules Format related to the implementation of rules rather than the ACT rules themselves:

• 14. ACT Data Format (Output Data)
• 15.2. Accuracy Benchmarking - AT RISK?
• 16. Rule Aggregation

Mixed in with these are these sections that are actually requirements for ACT rules themselves:

• 15.1. Test Cases (Atomic rules only)
• 17.1. Change Log
• 17.2. Issues List

These three requirements for ACT Rules are however not listed in the 4. ACT Rule Structure, making them seem less of a requirement for ACT Rules.

I suggest we:

• somehow make it clear from the structure of the document and in the wording of the sections which sections are specifically implementation related
• Add Test Cases, Change log and Issues list to the 4. ACT Rule Structure

[annethyme]

@WilcoFiers, you mentioned that this would go on the agenda this Thursday, but I don't see it explicitly. Do you see it as covered by the items on the agenda, #277 or #276?