-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expand accessibility requirements section #96
Conversation
act-rules-format.bs
Outdated
@@ -59,7 +59,9 @@ Each ACT Rule MUST have a description that is in plain language and provides a b | |||
Accessibility Requirements {#structure-accessibility-requirements} | |||
------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
|
|||
Explain the accessibility requirement being tested such as the WCAG 2 Success criterion and / or the technique the rule maps to; For example WCAG 2.0 Technique H67. | |||
Explain the accessibility requirement being tested such as the WCAG 2 Success criterion and / or the technique the rule maps to; For example WCAG 2.0 Technique H67. An ACT Rule DOES NOT have to test the entire accessibility requirement. The Rule COULD be used to test multiple accessibility requirements, when such requirements overlap each other. | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WCAG 2
=> WCAG 2.0
, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could also be WCAG 2.1 criteria once it is released. It doesn't matter much.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor: Made some editorial suggestions in PR #102.
Major: Should we change "Accessibility Requirements" to "Testing Requirements"? Actually ACT Rules test anything that is defined as a "requirement", whether it is accessibility, usability, general QA, or whatever.
This section explains the accessibility requirements to which the rule maps, (for example, WCAG 2.0 success criterion 1.1.1). An ACT Rule DOES NOT have to test the entire accessibility requirement. The Rule COULD be used to test multiple accessibility requirements. Outcomes from an ACT Rule MUST be consistent within a rule, e.g. if the rule results in a failure, the failure MUST be for the defined accessibility requirement. This means that the rule maps to the accessibility requirement, as opposed to it merely being related to the requirement, thematically or otherwise. Note: For WCAG 2.0, the Success Criteria are the accessibility requirements. Often organizations have accessibility requirements in addition to the WCAG success criteria. These too can be tested using ACT Rules. |
This PR addresses #87