Need clarification on 1.4.11 SC for graphical object #3070
-
I have a question about the chart. For example, the line that represents the U.S. government information lacks a 3:1 contrast with the background. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
If there is no alternative in text form (e.g. a table with all the info from the chart in numerical form): yes, absolutely. Furthermore, all colors of the lines - each among each other - must keep a contrast of 3:1 or the lines must be distinguishable (e.g. direct labeling or different line shapes). If there is an alternative in text form: Then here, if I remember old discussions correctly, say that the table is sufficient and others say that this is not the case because relevant information can be captured better graphically than in table form |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/non-text-contrast.html#graphical-objects
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
While the one cyan line is a bit low in contrast for AA, the bigger issue, as you can see from the example below, is that this is a significant fail for A, 1.4.1 which requires that color not be the only way that information is conveyed. In the following image the upper left sample is standard vision, the two samples on the right are common CVD types. Looking at the deuteranopia and protanopia, notice that you cannot distinguish most of the lines from each other, or identify them clearly per the legend. While there is luminance variation, luminance is a poor way to encode information, that is for data coding like corresponding lines on a chart, two and at the most three variations if relying on luminance. The lines need something more: occasional markers or dotted/dashed/etc. Simulation from myndex.com/CVD/ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/non-text-contrast.html#graphical-objects