Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

arch-thing-bundling : Things MAY be bundled together with a Consumer to enable Thing-to-Thing interaction. #634

Closed
Tracked by #625
mlagally opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
Tracked by #625

arch-thing-bundling : Things MAY be bundled together with a Consumer to enable Thing-to-Thing interaction. #634

mlagally opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
@sebastiankb
Labels
blocks publication remove

Comments

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mlagally mlagally mentioned this issue Nov 17, 2021
Closed
10 tasks
@benfrancis
Copy link
Member

From #625 (comment)...

  • arch-thing-bundling : Things MAY be bundled together with a Consumer to enable Thing-to-Thing interaction.
    First time I am hearing this and I have no idea what it means. A consumer can form a mashup of things but this cannot magically create T2T interactions. At least no one has done in the WG/IG before as far as I know. Thankfully only a MAY assertion.

It is certainly possible for a single software application to act as both a WoT Consumer and a WoT Producer (actually WebThings Gateway does this), but I agree the idea of direct Thing to Thing interactions is purely theoretical and I've never really been convinced by that use case.

Conclusion: ❌ I think this could safely be removed.

Suggested action: Remove the assertion.

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor Author

Arch call on 25.11.: remove

@k-toumura k-toumura mentioned this issue Dec 1, 2021
Closed
sebastiankb added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2021
@sebastiankb
remove assertations
b4300b7 
removes #632 #633 #634
@sebastiankb sebastiankb mentioned this issue Dec 16, 2021
Merged
@sebastiankb
Copy link
Contributor

accidentally I merged this directly to the main...

If there is a complain I will revert..

@sebastiankb sebastiankb reopened this Dec 23, 2021
@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sebastiankb
I'm not sure how you merged it - the MR is still open and apparently has merge conflicts.
Please revert the merge to ensure we can properly review in the call.

@mlagally
Copy link
Contributor Author

Arch call on May 19th.
Text had been removed, closing the issue.

@mlagally mlagally mentioned this issue May 19, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sebastiankb sebastiankb

Labels
blocks publication remove
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@benfrancis @sebastiankb @mlagally