Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

creating a PROFINET binding template file #351

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Kaz040
Copy link

@Kaz040 Kaz040 commented Feb 13, 2024

This pull request is about creating a binding template for PROFINET devices. For now, I just created the index.html file and the JSON schema. I am presently working on using the work flow pipeline of this repository.

pending on when I will make a pull request that will include other entities of the template. I would like to start collecting feedback from people that I will share this link with.

As a little introduction.

PROFINET is a popular communication protocol that is based on industrial Ethernet. It is commonly used at Shopfloor to control and monitor field devices at speed that conform to many industrial automation applications. Presently there is an interest to provide context for parameters in a PROFINET device and Web of Things TD is seen as a description model that could help achieve that.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Deploy Preview for wot-binding-templates ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2a74627
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/wot-binding-templates/deploys/65d8599b4898b90008796f94
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-351--wot-binding-templates.netlify.app/bindings/protocols/profinet
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant